Web20 jul. 2024 · Hussainara Khatoon & Ors. vs. Home Secretary, State of Bihar. The case is a landmark judgment on the speedy trial of cases that came to be recognized as a fundamental right of every accused person. It is a facet of the rightful administration of justice. The Constitutional obligation upon State to undertake the protection of rights of ... Web3 dec. 2024 · DOC-20241203-WA0174 - Read online for free. ... Share with Email, opens mail client
Poor Accused Weeps In Silence - Legal Services India
Web1 feb. 2024 · Hussainara Khatoon & Ors. it is a landmark case, decided on 9 March 1979, which provided a broad definition of Article 21 and stated that a speedy trial is a … Web9 apr. 2024 · In the landmark 1979 ruling in ‘Hussainara Khatoon v. State of Bihar’, the SC recognised the right to a speedy trial as “implicit in the broad sweep and content of Article 21”. “No procedure which does not ensure a reasonably quick trial can be regarded as “reasonable, fair or just” and it would fall foul of Article 21,” the court had said. german for crazy person
Necessity of Legal Aid - Hussainara Khatoon
Web27 okt. 2015 · Case Study- Hussainara Khatoon V. State of Bihar, AIR 1979 SC 1377 Hussainara Khatoon v. State of Bihar, AIR 1979 SC 1377 Source- … The then prevailing laws in India permitted that, in case of commission of an offence, only the victim or a relative of the victim could file a petition before the court. Ignoring this mandate, a writ of habeas corpus came before the Supreme Court of India, filed by Pushpa Kapila Hingorani, along with her … Meer weergeven The right to a speedy and just trial is granted to every human being, and the State does not discriminate against individuals on the basis of caste, religion, gender or place of birth. Article 21 of the Indian … Meer weergeven The case of Hussainara Khatoon revolutionised the Indian legal system. Hussainara was one of the six women undertrial … Meer weergeven A significant number of men, women, and even children, were kept behind bars, awaiting their trials for years. The offences for which some of the prisoners were charged were … Meer weergeven The Supreme Court held that the detention of these prisoners was illegal as it completely violated the Fundamental Right to Life and Liberty under Article 21 of the Indian … Meer weergeven Web10 apr. 2024 · vii. The right to a speedy trial – Hussainara Khatoon v Home Secretary, State of Bihar. viii. The right against handcuffing – Prem Shankar Shukla v Delhi Administration. ix. The right against custodial violence – Sheela Barse v State of Maharashtra. x. The right against public hanging – A G of India v Lachma Devi. xi. german for dishwasher